THE SHORT ANSWER

A Cantonese adaptation may keep an image, replace it with a different one, or state the practical meaning directly. Compare the intended message and force as well as the picture; a change from a statement to a pointed question can matter as much as the new imagery.

From being born yesterday to being three years old

The English hook “I wasn’t born yesterday” rejects the idea that the speaker is easily fooled. The Cantonese response asks whether the listener takes the speaker for a three-year-old child. Both use youth as an image of inexperience, but the Cantonese makes the listener’s treatment of the speaker explicit.

In an invented situation where a friend offers an obviously implausible excuse, the pointed question can challenge that excuse. It is not a request to discuss the speaker’s actual age. Notice the change in form: a statement about yourself becomes a question addressed to the other person.

你當我三歲細路呀?

nei5 dong3 ngo5 saam1 seoi3 sai3 lou6 aa3

Do you take me for a three-year-old?

The image and sentence form both change.

From being made of money to money falling from the sky

“We’re not made of money” imagines people composed of money. 我哋啲錢唔係天跌落嚟㗎 instead rejects money arriving effortlessly from the sky. The practical objection concerns treating the available money as unlimited or easy to obtain, but the visual explanation has changed.

The recorded line is a forceful response about money, not financial advice. In a fictional conversation about repeatedly adding expensive extras to a plan, it could challenge that assumption. A translator still needs to consider whether that force suits the relationship; matching a metaphorical purpose does not make the response neutral.

我哋啲錢唔係天跌落嚟㗎

ngo5 dei6 di1 cin2 m4 hai6 tin1 dit3 lok6 lai4 gaa3

Our money does not fall from the sky.

A bag, a lane and a devil can disappear

The series renders “Don’t fumble the bag” as a request not to waste the opportunity. The bag image disappears and the intended object of concern becomes explicit. Likewise, the response to “Stay in your lane” tells the listener to attend to their own affairs rather than preserving a roadway picture.

Merriam-Webster explains “speak of the devil” as a remark when someone being discussed unexpectedly appears. 講起佢佢就到 simply states that sequence. Removing the devil avoids requiring the listener to recognise the English expression, while also losing the familiar English wording that signals the reference.

唔好嘥咗個機會

m4 hou2 saai1 zo2 go3 gei1 wui6

Do not squander the opportunity.

The opportunity is named; the bag image is removed.

講起佢佢就到

gong2 hei2 keoi5 keoi5 zau6 dou3

Talk about her and she turns up.

The event sequence remains without the devil image.

Choose the purpose of your version

Keeping an image may help a bilingual audience recognise a quotation. Replacing it can create an understandable picture in the target wording. Removing it can communicate the practical meaning directly. These are choices to assess in context, not a ranking where the most literal version always wins.

Try the comparison with an original scenario: a friend is about to ignore a useful opportunity. State the intended warning in plain English, inspect the recorded Cantonese response, and identify the lost picture. If you invent an alternative, label it as your new wording until its meaning and naturalness have been checked.

Choose the purpose of your version: a quick comparison
Translation moveExample in this comparisonWhat changes
Replace a related imageBorn yesterday → three-year-oldA youthful-inexperience image and a direct question.
Replace a different imageMade of money → money from the skyThe picture for easy or unlimited money.
Remove the imageFumble the bag → waste an opportunityMeaning becomes explicit; the object metaphor disappears.

HEAR THE LINE IN CONTEXT

Watch with Auntie

Do you take me for a three-year-old?

This clip illustrates one expression connected with the topic. The written examples above extend the lesson.

Open the full phrase lesson ↗

More lines to explore

We're not made of money Don't fumble the bag Speak of the devil
Do you take me for a three-year-old? · with AuntieWatch the exchange, then try the Cantonese line.
Read the Cantonese line
Cantonese
你當我三歲細路呀?
Jyutping
nei5 dong3 ngo5 saam1 seoi3 sai3 lou6 aa3
English
Do you take me for a three-year-old?

YOUR TURN

Try it yourself

The response to “Speak of the devil” is 講起佢佢就到. What remains, what disappears, and why might that be useful?

See one possible answer

The sequence remains: someone is mentioned and then appears. The devil image and the exact English idiom disappear. A listener unfamiliar with the English expression can still understand what happened, while a reference-focused translation might need an explanatory note.

Keep these in mind

  • Compare purpose, imagery and interpersonal force separately.
  • The recorded adaptations sometimes replace a picture and sometimes remove it.
  • A useful paraphrase is not automatically a traditional or universal equivalent.

Sources & further reading